Clear Decisions Logoclear decisions
CBOM Analysis Platform

EU CoC Future‑Readiness Report

Policy‑level assessment across 30 core practices

Clear Decisions Data Centre • Generated Recently

What is a CBOM?

A Compliance Bill of Materials (CBOM) maps your policies and evidence to regulatory requirements. This report benchmarks your data‑centre practices against the 2025 EU Code of Conduct.

It reviews 30 publicly verifiable practices, highlighting gaps and quick‑win improvements—without exposing sensitive operational data.

CBOM Assessment Summary

Practice Coverage

40%

12 of 30 EU CoC practices analyzed

Compliance Score

13%

Overall compliance with improvement opportunities

30
Core Practices
4
Fully Compliant
8
Partially Compliant
18
Non-Compliant

Category Performance Overview

Detailed breakdown across key compliance areas showing readiness and coverage metrics

Data Centre Utilisation, Management & Planning

0%
0%
Readiness
40%
Coverage

5 practices assessed

0
Compliant
2
Partial
3
Gap

IT Equipment and Services

8%
8%
Readiness
33%
Coverage

12 practices assessed

1
Compliant
3
Partial
8
Gap

Cooling

0%
0%
Readiness
33%
Coverage

6 practices assessed

0
Compliant
2
Partial
4
Gap

Cooling System Design

0%
0%
Readiness
33%
Coverage

3 practices assessed

0
Compliant
1
Partial
2
Gap

Data Centre Building

100%
100%
Readiness
100%
Coverage

1 practices assessed

1
Compliant
0
Partial
0
Gap

Monitoring & Measurement

100%
100%
Readiness
100%
Coverage

2 practices assessed

2
Compliant
0
Partial
0
Gap

Other

0%
0%
Readiness
0%
Coverage

1 practices assessed

0
Compliant
0
Partial
1
Gap

Ready to Accelerate Your Compliance Journey?

This foundational analysis shows just the beginning. Get access to all 171 practices, expert guidance, and collaborative tools to ensure complete EU Code of Conduct compliance.

Get Full Platform Access

Compliant Practices

These EU Code of Conduct practices show strong evidence of compliance in your documentation

Compliant Practices

4 practices showing strong compliance evidence

9.3.5High Priority
Conformant

PUE Reporting per ISO Standards

Do you calculate and report your data center's Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) in accordance with the ISO/IEC 30134-2 standard?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 95%

Evidence Found

Our PUE is calculated monthly at Category 2, following ISO/IEC 30134-2. Total facility energy is from utility meter M-001, and IT equipment energy is aggregated from all metered rack PDUs. For April 2025, our PUE was 1.38.

Analysis

Comprehensive PUE reporting system with Category 2 accuracy, automated data collection, and regular reporting demonstrating strong compliance with ISO standards.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewData Analysis

Source Documents

Clear Decisions 2024 Corporate Sustainability Report.pdf

Pages: 12, 14, 18

8.3.3High Priority
Conformant

Water Consumption Metering

Do you meter your facility's water consumption, particularly for cooling systems, to track usage and identify inefficiencies?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 88%

Evidence Found

Our 'Site Beta' facility has water sub-meters on cooling tower make-up and adiabatic cooler supply. Data is logged hourly in our BMS and reviewed weekly. This data is essential for our monthly WUE calculation.

Analysis

Water consumption metering fully implemented with comprehensive monitoring, sub-metering, and regular review processes demonstrating strong operational practices.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewData Analysis

Source Documents

Facilities Management Report.pdf

Pages: 8, 12, 15

9.3.12High Priority
Conformant

WUE Reporting per ISO Standards

Do you calculate and report your data center's Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) in accordance with the ISO/IEC 30134-9 standard?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 91%

Evidence Found

Our data centre uses cooling towers, and we report WUE annually as per ISO/IEC 30134-9. For 2024, our WUE was 1.75 L/kWh of IT equipment energy. This information is a component of our EED submission.

Analysis

WUE reporting fully implemented with ISO-compliant methodology, regular calculation, and integration with regulatory reporting requirements.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewData Analysis

Source Documents

Clear Decisions 2024 Corporate Sustainability Report.pdf

Pages: 22, 28

4.1.1Critical Priority
Conformant

Energy Efficiency in IT Procurement

Is the energy efficiency performance of new IT devices (using metrics like SERT or SPECPower) a high priority decision factor in your tender process?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 89%

Evidence Found

As per our 'Sustainable IT Procurement Policy (ITP-004)', energy efficiency is a mandatory high-priority criterion, accounting for 25% of the total score in server tenders. We require vendors to provide SERT scores and power consumption data at 20%, 50%, and 80% utilization levels.

Analysis

Energy efficiency clearly prioritized in IT procurement with documented scoring methodology, vendor requirements, and successful implementation in recent procurements.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewProcess Verification

Source Documents

IT Procurement Policy.pdf

Pages: 5, 11, 18

Partially Compliant Practices

These practices show some evidence but require additional documentation or implementation

Partially Compliant Practices

3 practices requiring additional documentation or implementation

3.1.1Critical Priority
Minor non-conformance

Cross-Functional Approval Board

Do you have a cross-functional approval board (including Senior Management, IT, M&E, Software, Procurement) that must approve significant data center decisions to ensure impacts are understood?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 65%

Evidence Found

IT and facilities managers discuss important changes in monthly meetings, and we have informal consultation with procurement and senior management on major projects, but we don't have a formal cross-functional approval board with documented Terms of Reference and defined decision thresholds.

Analysis

Cross-functional discussions occur regularly but need formal board establishment with documented charter, defined membership, and clear decision-making authority to meet compliance requirements.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewInterview

Source Documents

Data Centre Governance Policy.pdf

Pages: 3, 5

3.2.5High Priority
Minor non-conformance

Environmental Management System

Does your organization have a formal, documented Environmental Management System (EMS), for example, aligned with ISO 14001?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 58%

Evidence Found

We discuss environmental considerations in quarterly management reviews and have implemented some environmental initiatives, but we don't have a formal Environmental Management System aligned with ISO 14001 or documented environmental objectives and targets.

Analysis

Environmental considerations are present in management processes but need formal Environmental Management System implementation with documented procedures, objectives, and ISO 14001 alignment.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewInterview

Source Documents

Management Review Minutes.pdf

Pages: 12, 18

4.1.3Critical Priority
Minor non-conformance

Operating Temperature/Warranty Requirement

Do your IT procurement specifications define acceptable operating temperature and humidity ranges, including warranty coverage for those ranges?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 61%

Evidence Found

We discuss ASHRAE A2 compliance with vendors during procurement and most of our recent equipment can operate in these ranges, but we don't have formal procurement specifications mandating A2 compliance or requiring vendor documentation of continuous operational capability.

Analysis

ASHRAE A2 compliance is considered in procurement discussions but needs formal policy mandate, vendor specification requirements, and documented compliance verification.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewVendor Documentation Review

Source Documents

Vendor Evaluation Reports.pdf

Pages: 8, 15

Non-Compliant Practices

These practices show no evidence of implementation and require immediate attention

Non-Compliant Practices

3 practices requiring immediate attention and implementation

3.2.6High Priority
Non-conformant

Energy Management System

Does your organization have a formal, documented Energy Management System (EnMS), for example, aligned with ISO 50001?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 0%

No Evidence Found

No evidence found of formal Energy Management System aligned with ISO 50001 or systematic approach to energy management with documented procedures and performance indicators.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewInterview
3.2.8High Priority
Non-conformant

Public Renewable Energy Reporting

Does the organization publicly report the percentage of electricity sourced from renewables for its facilities?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 0%

No Evidence Found

No evidence found of renewable energy tracking, public reporting of renewable energy percentages, or documented renewable energy procurement strategy.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewData Analysis
5.1.1Critical Priority
Non-conformant

Hot/Cold Aisle Design Implementation

Is your data center designed using the 'Hot / Cold Aisle' concept to ensure consistent airflow direction and separation?

CBOM Assessment

Confidence: 0%

No Evidence Found

No evidence found of Hot/Cold Aisle design implementation, airflow direction management, or documented cooling layout strategy.

Verification Methods

Document ReviewSite Inspection
Unlock Your Complete CBOM Journey

Advanced Analysis & Full Platform Access

This foundational analysis covers core practices with detailed CBOM findings. Complete your compliance journey with our full platform featuring all 171 practices, advanced analytics, and comprehensive remediation guidance.